If you thought the Manchester City sagawith its 115 chargeswas almost over, think again.
Two years after the hearings began, the league announced City has been found guilty on every charge covering the 2009‑10 to 2017‑18 seasons.
The club maintains its innocence and says it will pursue every appeal route, arguing the ruling contains clear errors of law, principle and fact.
The turmoil looks set to deepen as uncertainty mounts.
Supporters and the wider football community are left to guess at the likely sanction and when a final decision might arrive.
Given the gravity of the accusations, a points deduction now seems unavoidable, though City disputes the claims vigorously.
How and when any penalty is imposed will matter not just for City but for the entire Premier League.
That’s before clubs even consider suing City for possible compensation.
Maresca’s side travel to Liverpool on 11 October when the league resumes; a six‑point lead could evaporate in an instant.
Here are four possible outcomes – none of them pleasant.
No appetite in the league to strip titles, but the threat still lingers.
Scenario one: No punishment announced this season
Speedy punishment is essential, yet certainty remains elusive.
With the charges denied, an independent panel will conduct a sanction hearing.
All options are on the table: fines, points cuts or even demotion.
Chelsea’s earlier self‑reporting allowed a negotiated settlement, a path City has not taken.
The panel must sift through hundreds of pages to decide the penalty.
Recall Everton’s six‑point dock, later reduced, and Nottingham Forest’s four‑point loss.
Those were minor breaches; City faces seven PSR violations in the league plus five in UEFA contests.
Such a record points to a hefty points penalty.
The club is also accused of sham contracts that inflated revenues by roughly £830 million.
All this casts a shadow over the Premier League era from 2009‑18.
Chelsea admitted cheating; City was found guilty, bending rules to afford pricey signings.
If the season ends without a sanction, what does that mean for competition integrity?
A retroactive penalty for this season appears unlikely.
What if City still clinches the title?
Coventry sit third‑bottom; could they be relegated if City’s punishment arrives later?
This inertia threatens the league’s reputation.
A negotiated settlement might be the cleanest exit.
But the league may resist, fearing City will push for a lighter sentence.
Clubs seek legal advice over compensation claims against City
Man City supporters confront the reality of a guilty verdict
Legal battle could spiral, warns Purslow
Scenario two: Punishment imposed this season but City appeals
Standard procedure applies the points penalty immediately, pending appeal.
A massive deduction could effectively relegate the club.
If City’s league membership were revoked, mid‑season implementation is unclear.
A huge fine is possible, though points cuts seem more likely.
Timing of the decision and appeal outcome remains uncertain.
Regulation timelines exist, but their applicability here is doubtful.
City must file an appeal by Friday.
Typically the league requests an expedited arbitration process.
Complexities mean the path forward is anything but simple.
A slim chance exists that any sanction is only applied after the appeal.
That would spark protests from clubs demanding immediate effect.
Scenario three: Appeal heard quickly and full decision issued
For league integrity, a swift resolution is essential.
West Brom’s points loss was only announced on 24 April last season.
It sent them back into a relegation battle, giving hope to others.
The league wants to avoid a similar late‑season drama.
City could still overturn the ruling, as they did with a Champions League ban in 2020.
Unlike UEFA, they cannot take this case to the Court of Arbitration for Sport.
A victory would be celebrated at the Etihad but would not end the controversy.
Scenario four: Even after closure, the saga continues
Premier League clubs are consulting lawyers about compensation from City.
One senior executive expects individual claims to be filed against City.
Another top lawyer told the BBC the league might centralise the process.
League rules permit clubs to sue each other for compensation.
Everton was ordered to pay Burnley £35 million for a PSR breach.
Burnley argued the breach cost them Premier League survival and sought damages.
Everton is appealing, promising a robust defence, adding context to City’s case.
Statute‑of‑limitations questions linger over claim deadlines.
Arsenal, United, Liverpool and Tottenham reportedly preserved claim rights two years ago.
It isn’t just about United and Liverpool, who finished runners‑up to City.
It also concerns clubs that missed Champions League spots or faced relegation.
Claims could even target prize‑money and lost commercial revenue.
Maguire noted the Premier League handbook omits any limitation clause, a possible legal challenge for City.
But what about compensation? Champions League qualification alone could generate massive claims.
“The Champions League then was worth at least £30 million,” Maguire said, “by 2018 it was probably £60‑70 million in prize money.”
“Add gate receipts and sponsor bonuses, and the sums become staggering, though still speculative.”
“Player bonuses for Champions League qualification run around 25 % of salaries.”
“An average 2012 salary of £80‑90 k per week means a 25 % bonus equals £4‑5 million annually.”
Points cuts, fines and compensation claims loom.
The situation is a tangled mess for the Premier League and shows no sign of quick resolution.
Everton ordered to pay Burnley £35 million over a PSR breach
Pre‑match, post‑match and topical City content
Subscribe for all the City news you love